As seen on:

SMH Logo News Logo

Call 1300 303 181

Australia’s Best New Car News, Reviews and Buying Advice

Archive for November, 2014

A New Beginning And New Thinking For Luxury: Hyundai Genesis,

I was fortunate enough to be one of the drive team for the launch of a new entrant into the luxury car field, the Hyundai Genesis. Yes, Hyundai Genesis.  Don’t laugh because you’ve read Hyundai and luxury car in the same sentence, it is a remarkably well engineered, thought out and produced vehicle, topping out at just $82000. It’s a big car with a massive interior, thanks to a 5 metre length and 3 metre wheelbase. There’s design elements for the exterior reminiscent of some other brands, with the front being commented on most as being Aston Martin. That’s perhaps due to the winged emblem front and centre on the panel edge leading into the bonnet. There’s only one indication of who the maker is, with the Hyundai H on the bootlid. There’s three models in the range, starting in the mid $60K bracket, with the Sensory and Ultimate pack offerings being the trio.Genesis 1

The leading edge is an upright, bluff looking part of the car, sweeping over a long bonnet (housing the 3.8L V6, 232 kW/397 Nm powerplant) into an almost coupe like roofline before tapering off into a a short tail housing a good sized boot. It’s a cohesive and handsome design. The interior is a reflection of the outside, with deeply sculpted seats front and rear, with heating and cooling for the front, heating in the rear, full electric adjustment for driver and passenger plus memory seating, electric sunblind for the rear window, photochromatic glass for the sunroof Genesis 5and heated wing mirrors (which dip when reverse is selected). There’s adaptive cruise control to play with; Genesis 3think an extension of cruise control which merely has you travel at a preset speed, this uses a camera to track the vehicle in front to keep the Genesis at a set time gap (one to four seconds) behind the vehicle in front and will bring the Genesis to a stop at velocities up to 80 km/h. Over that, Genesis expects the human factor to come into play and steer the car out of trouble. There’s four other cameras as well; front, rear, with two in the side mirrors that will display a 360 degree view on the 9.2 inch 720p display screen, plus offer a choice of four angles front/side/rear. A downlight is the switchgear; although smartly and simply laid out, they lack the luxury look and feel expected, being of typical high quality but hard set Hyundai plastic; there’s also a harsh feeling pocket on the rear of the front seats, devoid of the same velour lining found in the door pockets and soft open/close clamshell centre console locker. The “entry level” Genesis gets plenty of tech such as Hill Start Assist, tyre pressure monitoring, the afore mentioned smart Genesis 4cruise control with the Sensory throwing in Head Up Display, rear cross traffic alert, the around view monitoring system and powered steering column whilst the Ultimate gets the panoramic glass sunroof, the sound proofed acoustic glass and more. A nice touch is a LED light that shines the Genesis logo from each wing mirror to the ground. There’s audio controls and front passenger seat controls in a fold down section in the rear seat, allowing those that prefer to be driven rather than drive themselves to move the seat for room and choose their own music. Both features are lockable via the menu system activated from the steering wheel buttons.

The eight speed transmission is Hyundai’s; smooth, fluid, seamless, imperceptible in gear changes unless the right foot is a heavy one. There’s a snarl from the front through the induction system but barely an exhaust note, thanks to the Genesis 8high level of exterior noise insulation. It will accelerate nicely, thank you muchly, with an almost double clutch feel to the changes when really pressed…again it’s a seamless transition with no sign of hesitation. On the roads chosen for the demonstration drives, a good mix of flat and straight roads versus speed humps and tight corners plus a few roundabouts, the Genesis is composed, compliant with a feel stopping short of sporty without compromising the comfort level of the ride. Variable ratio steering tightens up the turning, surprising many in the drive sessions with just how compact a turning circle the Genesis displays. Fuel consumption is quoted as 11.2L/100 km combined, with some urban legs about 13L/100 km. This is not unexpected and will trouble those only of the penny pinching persuasion. Hyundai says the target market is the affluent, professional style aged from 40 to 60; certainly the Genesis garnered plenty of attention, with Genesis 9the test cars in while, black, blue, silver and grey catching the eyes of many as we drove in convoy.

The hurdles Hyundai faces are not insurmountable, but they are well entrenched in the Australian automotive psyche. The mere mention of Hyundai still brings stifled giggles or remembrances of years gone by. Hyundai acknowledge this by offering a five year/unlimited kilometre warranty with service costs built into those five years. Hyundai will also offer a conditional buy back price (contact Hyundai for details). Naturally, the most criticism will come from those that Genesis 6haven’t and won’t drive it, as it’s “just a Hyundai”. That fact means there’s no great loss to Hyundai as they don’t need that clientele; what they will get are people willing to be open minded and see the Genesis for what it is. A New Beginning and New Thinking. Click here for details: http://www.hyundai.com.au/vehicles/genesis?gclid=COia6r6S78ECFQYwjgodRi0AmQ&gclsrc=ds#intro

A big thanks to Ian Luff’s Drive to Survive group for having me involved. http://credit-n.ru/microzaymi-blog-single.html

Having THAT Conversation With Grandpa

oldcarguyIt was one of those conversations.  I don’t think that I’ve seen a look on my mother’s face like that since my younger brothers were teenagers.  No, my mum wasn’t complaining about anything I was doing.  What she was frustrated about was an upcoming conversation she was going to have to have with my 91-year-old grandfather.  “If I ever get like that,” she said through gritted teeth, “just take the keys away from me.”

The tricky conversations she was having with my grandfather were about his driving.  Yes, he still had all his marbles and his eyesight.  He’d passed his medical tests for driving.  However, my grandfather is the stereotyped absent-minded professor who will serenely ignore all sorts of chaos around him and keep on going regardless.  “Keep Calm and Carry On” is advice he doesn’t need. He is the sort of person who would be so busy doing complicated mathematical operations with the numbers on the rego plate of the in front of him that he wouldn’t pay much attention to the sirens blaring and bearing down on him from behind.  He just couldn’t see what the problem was about and why we were all making a fuss about how he drove around town without his glasses – he was going to the optometrist’s wasn’t he?  And didn’t he know the way there?  OK, he wrote off his Fiat Uno in one ding a few years ago and has had a couple of close calls in the Suzuki Swift that replaced it.  And so what if he dies in a crash – he’s over 90 and ready to go, isn’t he?  So what was the problem?

The problem is that we have all seen him making all those scary last-minute dodges, getting lost after a detour around road works sends him somewhere that doesn’t look the way it did as he remembered it 30 years ago.  We’ve seen him getting in and out of the car park and nearly collecting other cars and a tree.  Quite frankly, I would rather ride in a car driven by my learner-licence teenage son than by my grandfather.  And we don’t want him to kill himself by accident in a car crash even if this idea doesn’t bother him.  He could easily take someone with him.  Or he could not see that kid on a bike that he doesn’t expect.  My mother was having THAT conversation because a few people had expressed concern about his driving.

Australia has phased out driving tests for older drivers on the grounds that a lot of older drivers are perfectly competent on the roads.  Fair enough, too.  You don’t magically become exactly like everybody else the moment that you have a certain birthday.  Older people need to stay independent for as long as possible, and this often means driving.

However, there are some factors that put older drivers at risk.  Older bones are more brittle and healing takes longer, so a ding that would merely bruise a younger driver could send Great-Aunt Mary to hospital with a fracture.  Reaction times do get slower.  Add in the way that a lot of older people prefer little hatchbacks that aren’t quite as sturdy in a collision and you have a recipe for trouble, especially in combination with absent-mindedness.

It’s tricky, though, telling an older driver that they’re becoming a hazard.  It requires tact, sensitivity and delicate handling.  I certainly don’t envy my mother the task (and am grateful that she has given me permission to just take the keys when the day comes).  Mind you, my mother already had THAT conversation once before many years ago when my grandmother’s Alzheimer’s was starting to kick in and affect her driving.

It’s better for everyone if older drivers are honest with themselves about their ability to drive safely.  The Transport Accident Commission has put together a list of warning signs that perhaps it’s time to think through your options (hire a chauffeur? public transport?).  These warning signs are:

  • Serious health conditions such as arthritis, epilepsy, high blood pressure, anxiety or a heart condition;
  • Medication that impairs driving;
  • Difficulty reacting to what other drivers are doing;
  • Regularly driving at inappropriate speeds, either too fast or too slow;
  • Always needing passengers to give you directions and tell you when it’s safe to enter intersections;
  • Regularly ignoring or misunderstanding traffic signs and signals;
  • Difficulty judging distances between vehicles
  • Getting easily flustered or angry;
  • Difficulty turning your body, head or neck for extra visibility;
  • Problems with glare from shiny things or other cars, especially at dawn or dusk;
  • One or more accidents in a short space of time;
  • Easily tired after driving for an hour or more;
  • Problems concentrating when driving;
  • Passengers pointing hazards out to you that you haven’t seen or don’t see until later
  • Feeling uncomfortable in heavy traffic.

(more information at the TAC website: http://www.tac.vic.gov.au/road-safety/safe-driving/older-drivers).

But there may be another solution.  A lot of modern cars have collision avoidance systems, blind spot monitoring and sensors here there and everywhere.  While these probably ought to be avoided like Ebola for learner drivers, they are just what an older driver needs to rein in a wandering mind or to supplement slowing reactions, or to point out hazards when you don’t have a handy passenger to do this for you.  So there you have it:  permission to go and grab a new sports car for your old age!

Happy driving, no matter how old you are,

Megan

  http://credit-n.ru/kreditnye-karty-blog-single.html

F1 in Crisis: Dear Bernie, What Have You Done?

The glamorous world of Formula One is never without scandalous news outbreaks, and as the motorsport juggernaut sets its sights firmly on Austin for the next round of the championship, all is not well. News has hit the shelves that Marussia and Caterham are set to miss the American round of the 2014 F1 championship due to ongoing financial woes; Marussia have since announced that they have gone into administration. It is uncertain whether either team will return to the series; their company futures hang in the balance.

Caterham and Marussia have been fighting it out throughout 2014 at the back of the grid. Image Credit: f1fanatic.co.uk

Caterham and Marussia have been fighting it out throughout 2014 at the back of the grid. Image Credit: f1fanatic.co.uk

Hang on a minute…

So that is two teams that will not be at the event. Some quick adding up brings me to a total of 4 cars that will not compete. In a field of 22 cars, to only have 18 competing means that around 1/5th of the grid is absent. Considering in the first qualifying session there are meant to be 6 cars eliminated, that would now make it well, two. So perhaps it is time for a little rethink on this whole qualifying malarkey for the time being maybe?

Just when you thought it was all over, other independent teams including Force India, Sauber and Lotus are rumoured to be holding secret talks with a threatened intention of boycotting the race this weekend in a show of support.  If the sport continues down this dark path of mind boggling budgets, it will end up pricing the non-manufacturer backed teams out of its maniacal grips.

In a year that has seen revolutionary new technical changes, record low attendance figures and now the threat of a GP with minimal competitors, there is but one question hovering on the lips of the masses: Is there a future for F1?

It is the view of this humble motorsport writer that the cause of these problems lies with two distinct yet ever so interlinked factors: the megalomaniacal Ecclestone leadership and of course, money.

Anyone remember this? After a tyre dispute only 6 cars took part in the 2005 Indianapolis GP. Image Credit: worldf1.allmyblog.com

Anyone remember this? After a tyre dispute only 6 cars took part in the 2005 Indianapolis GP. Image Credit: worldf1.allmyblog.com

But first let us delve into the history books to understand just how crucial this weekend may just become for Formula One. The sport has always had somewhat of a difficult time in many areas of America, thanks in no small part to the seemingly divine influence of NASCAR. It was in 2005 however that many would argue that F1 lost America. Following a tyre fiasco where Michelin tyres were not able to cope with track conditions without failure and a compromise could not be reached where a chicane was to be installed, all the Michelin clad teams pulled out living only those who used Bridgestone. This meant that only 6 cars eventually took part in the race; Ferrari, Jordan and Minardi made for a mind-numbing race that received a brutal backlash from both fans and teams. Following 2007, F1 departed American shores unsure of ever making a return.

As 2012 rolled around, hope was rekindled as it was announced that Formula One would once more hold a US GP. The kick in the guts came however when the great geniuses decided that all the great American race ways like Indianapolis, Laguna Seca or Road America (which has been described as the greatest test of road racing in North America, by the way) were just not good enough for the glamorous needs of Formula One. Instead, a new circuit was designed and built in Austin by none other than the great professor of tedium Hermann Tilke. In my view, the circuit shows no imagination and merely copycats all the great corners from other circuits across the world, while also following the utterly generic Tilke formula of lots of technical followed by a pointlessly long straight surrounded by a sea of tarmac run off areas. But that is another story.

Now, if one was already struggling to regain success in the states, surely the logical thing to avoid doing would be to make it worse. The worst thing I could think of is to essentially tell the Americans that neither their sum total nor their individual parts are good enough for you and then follow this up by ‘showing them how its done’ and creating a circuit that fits your high brow money wasting objectives. Oh and while I think of it, if you really wanted to rub salt in the infected wound, you would name the circuit something pretentious and downright ridiculous like oh, I don’t know, ‘Circuit Of The Americas’. All that would do surely would further isolate the audiences you so yearn to get back with your wonderful blend of condescension and elitism. No one would be stupid enough to do tha… Oh.

And herein lies the issue.

Sometimes I wonder if Bernie Ecclestone does this on purpose...

Sometimes I wonder if Bernie Ecclestone does this on purpose… Image Credit: f1-memes.tumblr.com

So where does the fault lie in all of this? Many people including he who writes these words that you find yourself reading would believe that it is the almighty leader of Formula One, Bernie Ecclestone who spearheads this spectacular tumble off a cliff. For many years, I have often found myself considering the thought that Bernie is very much like the Emperor from Star Wars. I am not just talking about his propensity for murdering innocent Jedi, but his ability to fabricate his own scandals in a way that works out positively for him. It would appear that by creating these headlines, he receives free media coverage by the press which stirs up conversation about F1 which often ends with a refreshed look at the sport and of course, new audiences. In many ways me writing this article about him is just playing into his intricately clever plans. Well done sir.

One of the problems I have highlighted with his leadership with his apparent desire for world domination. And when I say world domination, I mean intrusion into countries that will give him ALL OF THE MONEY. It would very much come to explain why in the modern generation of F1 there has been somewhat of an Eastern expansion to rich Arab nations. Try and call it a coincidence, I dare you. On a related note, it is important to note that 2014 has seen worryingly low attendance figures across the board. This has been most noticeable on the ‘traditional’ European tracks that have been on the championship calendar the longest. Once again, the point finger of blame goes directly to Mr Ecclestone; he charges a whole range of flat rates to different circuits to host a GP every year (between £10 and £18 million) which then have a brain melting set of extra clauses and charges which results in escalating charges per year. The subsequent ticket prices are then astronomically high. There is a reason I have not attended the British GP for many years now; I have been looking up 2015 admission prices and general race day admission is £155. No stand seat, no benefit, just entry to the circuit. If you were crazy enough to want a stand seat you are looking at some prices upwards of £360 for one. But at the end of the day when the Ecclestone money grabber is charging so much for the circuits to host the events, they do not really have much of a choice if they wish to make a decent return.

What doesn’t really help in addition is the new engine regulations that has resulted in a sport deafened by the sound of silence. One of the driving passions of all motorsport fans is the activation of all the senses while at an event. Hearing the thunderous scream of the F1 engine has always been key in the enjoyment of the sport; but now that has all but disappeared while being replaced by a quieter rumble, if you wish to call it that. The spectacle of the sport has somewhat lessened, which may indeed also go to explaining the reduced audience numbers. Why spend all that money when you can watch the races from the comfort of your own home and just, turn the television up?

The smaller independent teams simply do not have the budget to compete with the all conquering factory teams like Mercedes. Image Credit: imgarcade.com

The smaller independent teams simply do not have the budget to compete with the all conquering factory teams like Mercedes. Image Credit: imgarcade.com

Last and most significantly not least I would like to present you with the financial black hole that has no boundaries; it bleeds resources dry and attacks from the inside. What demon is it that I speak of? I am indeed referring to the cost of running a team within the championship itself, which circles right back to the start of this article and the absence of Marussia and Caterham from the American GP for 2014. There had been talks to impose a cost cap of £40 million budget for teams but this notion has disappeared into the vast ocean of the past now it would seem. The lowest budget in the grid was the £60 – 70 million of Marussia which may seem a lot to your every day human, but compare this to the rumoured £400+ million of Red Bull Racing, which definitely puts things in perspective. Unless buyers can be found the teams will be lost for good. Sadly, ever the man full of sympathy, Bernie Ecclestone was unmoved by the loss of these teams, stating that if they are to go then that is what will happen; we need small teams if they are going to be there performing properly and not moving around with begging buckets.

It is simple fact that the independent teams are going to struggle, especially if they lose one of their backers or a major sponsor, where the manufacturer backed teams have both factory support and major sponsors to fall back on. In the minds of the F1 elites, the high cost is vital to producing the best championship and clearly to prove how glamorously sophisticated it all is. To Bernie, if you do not have the money, then you do not matter. Let me refer you to the British Touring Car Championship, which in the last few years has released new NGTC regulations which actually put a spending cap on each team for the year. The championship now has a bulging 31 entries and better quality racing than it has seen in years. In fact, most people would be against the return of big name manufacturers, while preferring the smaller independent-backed teams. With the price cap, more teams have been able to join, while Alan Gow and TOCA have been able to sculpt an in-depth set of regulations that allow both freedom yet retain a balance of performance. Throwing lots of money at a problem and assuming it will automatically solve itself is not particularly clever. The trick is creating a high quality set of regulations that allow for your end objective without needing budgets that baffle the foundations of finances. Quality not quantity I believe is the phrase.

And so, Formula One has unwittingly backed itself into a crisis corner. Under its current leadership, costs are spiralling out of control and teams will fast begin to drop out the championship faster than Mr Ecclestone can throw money in their way to cover it up. For now it is Marussia and Caterham, next it may be Force India or even Sauber. who really knows. Unless you have factory support, you are never really safe. The saddest part is, we are living in a world that has been crippled by economic issues and there is simply just not the same extravagant levels of funds available as there used to be. It is such a massive shame however that Bernie Ecclestone will never be able to accept this and adapt his championship to suit these conditions. He is a man hell bent on power and refuses to change his ways. If he continues to refuse to accept the inevitable then he will face the ultimate downfall of his beloved championship. New leadership is needed, perhaps from someone who understands the current climate and can work with that. The question remains…

Dear Bernie, What Have You Done?

Keep Driving People!

Follow me on Twitter and let me know what you think @lewisglynn69

Peace and Love!

  http://credit-n.ru/kredity-online-blog-single.html