![\"AAAA's](\"http:\/\/blog.privatefleet.com.au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/AAAAs-Stuart-Charity-1.jpg\")
<\/p>\nThe aftermarket industry for the automotive field is a multi-billion dollar industry. It covers items such as oil, filters, light globes, seats and seat covers, wheels, tyres, roll bars, roo bars, lights and more. And there’s a push to make sure that you, the buying motorist, gets looked after. The Australian Automotive Aftermarket Association (AAAA) submission to the Australian Consumer Law Review demands better protection for Australia\u2019s 17 million vehicle owners.<\/p>\n
The AAAA wants a special focus on protection of vehicle owners\u2019 consumer rights because of the high value of the initial purchase and ongoing maintenance, and the vital contribution vehicles make to consumers\u2019 working and family lives and to the Australian economy.<\/p>\n
Executive Director Stuart Charity said this Consumer Law Review is required because there is a significant power imbalance between consumers and the large global vehicle manufacturers and their dealer networks.<\/p>\n
\u201cAAAA is uniquely positioned as a technically astute observer of the consumer protection regime for new vehicle sales and their ongoing servicing and repair. The 21st century is bringing significant change to the way we buy and maintain vehicles,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe AAAA observes that Australian Consumer Law, while successfully delivering improvements in consumer protection, does not currently adequately protect consumer rights in respect to car purchase and ownership.<\/p>\n
\u201cRecent examples include the behaviour of VW in their emissions scam, the slow and imperfect responses by Toyota to their poor pedal design and by General Motors to its ignition switch fault. These cases affected millions of vehicle owners.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere are sections of Australian consumer law that are subject to ‘creative compliance’ rather than actual compliance with the letter and the spirit of the law,\u201d said Mr Charity.<\/p>\n
Lemon Law<\/strong><\/p>\n Another key issue raised by AAAA in its Australian Consumer Law Review is the lack of a clear definition for what constitutes a \u201cmajor failure\u201d for motor vehicles. \u201cWe need what is commonly referred to as a “Lemon Law”. \u201cThe AAAA supports the clear definition of \u2018motor vehicle major failure\u2019 used to protect consumers in the USA,\u201d he said. From the perspective of road safety, AAAA is concerned that there is no rigorous consumer protection to ensure owners learn about vehicle recalls and technical service bulletins in a timely manner. Mr Charity said: \u201cAt present, there is a voluntary industry code in place, which requires car manufacturers to advise vehicle owners in the event of a safety recall.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cHowever, the manufacturer is not obligated to maintain contact with vehicle owners should they change address, or to advise the new owner when a vehicle is sold. \u201cTechnical service bulletins include information on known vehicle faults and fixes that are not deemed by the car manufacturer to warrant a full safety recall. These important bulletins are not shared with the owners or independent repairers working outside the authorised dealership networks.<\/p>\n \u201cThe AAAA calls for a mandatory process to ensure car manufacturers notify vehicle owners and the entire service and repair industry of all safety recalls and technical service bulletins. Only a robust advisory process will ensure that Australians owning new and second hand vehicles are travelling in safe vehicles.\u201d<\/p>\n Promote competition to empower consumers.<\/strong><\/p>\n AAAA strongly advocates the principle that car manufacturers must provide consumers with access to data related to the service and repair of their vehicles and control over the data generated by their vehicles. \u201cCurrently there is no legal protection for consumer access to data stored in electronic log books or data exchanged via telematics,\u201d said Stuart Charity.<\/p>\n \u201cFor example, AAAA believes that the owner should be able to assign permission to access and update their cars electronic log book to their repairer of choice, be that a dealer or an independent (non-dealership) workshop.<\/p>\n \u201cSince 2009, AAAA also has advocated for a mandatory industry code that ensures manufacturers make service and repair information available to independent workshops for a fair price.<\/p>\n \u201cA mandatory code will create a level playing field with both dealerships and independent workshops able to operate using the latest technical data. Consumers will then benefit greatly because they will have genuine choice of repairer opportunities. \u201cCurrent Australian consumer law is not sufficiently protecting vehicle owners\u2019 rights. In many comparable international jurisdictions, the issue of vehicle data ownership is recognised and is protected through special provisions to ensure competition is maintained in this important market.<\/p>\n \u201cAustralia has made great progress in protecting markets and consumers, but in respect of vehicle ownership, we must do better.\u201d<\/p>\n![\"Lemon](\"http:\/\/blog.privatefleet.com.au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Lemon-car.jpg\")
The absence of an Australian Lemon Law leads to significant consumer disadvantage. Under current regulations, car owners are forced to return to the point of sale repeatedly for \u2018repairs\u2019 and often do not achieve a satisfactory outcome over an unreasonably long period.<\/p>\n
\n
\nUnsafe products.<\/strong><\/p>\n![\"roo](\"http:\/\/blog.privatefleet.com.au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/roo-bar.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"car](\"http:\/\/blog.privatefleet.com.au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/car-mechanic.jpg\")
<\/p>\n