Archive for April, 2011
It’s a big moment in anybody’s life when they first get handed the keys to the family car. How well I remember my first drive in the family’s VW Beetle… It’s also a big moment for parents when they put their teenager in the driver’s seat of the car and let them head out onto the road for the first time.
While your teenager is on their L licence, everyone in the family knows their roles and responsibilities: your teenager isn’t allowed to drive unless there’s an experienced driver in the car with them (preferably in the front passenger seat) as they clock up the hours in their log book. The only debate that might crop up at this stage is who counts as an “experienced driver” – your teenager might try to convince you that their best friend’s big brother counts. But it’s when your teenager gets their P licence and can drive solo that you need to set some family rules.
First of all, congratulate your teenager on passing. It’s big achievement for them, and it’s important to focus on this positive before getting into the more controversial stuff and the rules. They’re another step closer to being a fully independent adult! (Try to forget that time when they were four and rode their bike straight into the only tree in an open space).
Many of the rules and restrictions are already spelled out by law. These will govern the sort of car your teen is allowed to drive with P-plates (if you’re not sure whether your teenager is allowed to drive your family Holden Commodore, to take one example, have a look at this VicRoads database. It saves a lot of arguments). The peer passenger restriction also makes it strictly illegal for your teen to cart their friends around unless someone over the age of 23 is in the car. (Note: the rules in this paragraph apply to the state of Victoria; other states have other rules, but they’re all pretty similar). The important thing for parents here is to be sticklers and enforce the laws of the land strictly.
And you’ve got to set some family restrictions. Being able to drive solo is a huge responsibility and gives a larger measure of freedom to your teenager. It’s highly likely that your teenager is driving the family car rather than their own, and as your name is on the ownership papers and you have to pay for things like the insurance and all the rest of it, you get a say in how the car gets used. The exact rules that your family sets will be unique to your situation, but it is probably a good idea to discuss the following points and make the rules clear:
Who pays for the petrol? And who is responsible for getting the car topped up? Does your teen have to do any of the car maintenance that you can do at home (rotating tyres, checking and topping up the oil, etc.)? Who pays for any repairs if your teen has a ding?
What responsibilities come with the privilege of using the family car? For example, if your teen is allowed to drive to school, do they have to take younger siblings? (If the answer to this is yes, it might pay to have a talk with the younger sibling about acceptable behaviour when Big Brother/Sister is behind the wheel).
Will the car keys and the ability to drive be granted automatically to your teenager? Or do parents have the ability to withhold driving privileges if, for example, your teenager has been behaving badly at school?
What will be the consequences of violating the legal rules (whether or not your teenager gets caught by the cops)? What about violating family rules?
Don’t make this conversation too heavy. Remember to begin and end this conversation with congratulations and a positive attitude.
Kids love to send the electric windows down at any time of the day. “Helicopter wobbing” – as we call it – is the loud vibrations in the air waves from windows that have been sent down while travelling at highway speeds. There’s nothing more irritating! Well, almost. A high-pitched scream from the aftermath of a squabble in the back seat features right up the list of most unwanted noises on a long car trip. Hey, I love our kids. And I enjoy the electric windows – especially the one-touch switches that go all the way up after one flick of the switch. The anti-pinch function with electric windows is also something I love, having had my finger squeezed in electric windows without this safety feature – the experience lets you know what that medieval torture device known as the thumbscrew felt like. Electronic luxuries, even the luxuries that are not linked to electronics, can be a car owner’s delight – delights that will make the car trip a pleasure, delights that set the standard, and delights that you can show off to all your mates. What are the bells and whistles that you could never do without?
The days of the horse and carriage are over – at least for now. Though I reckon you still could combine high-tech carriages with solar power and horses easily enough, and market them as being the most fuel-efficient, least harmful to the environment vehicles in the world. But even the horse and carriage of the nineteenth century had the finest luxury materials of the day. The leather on some of the premium carriages was so beautifully crafted that it has a charm and warmth completely missing from most of today’s high-end car interior upholsteries – though Jaguars of the 1980s and 1990s could match them. That was what made the Jaguar of this era so charming. The warmth of the interior welcomed you with soft sumptuous leather seats. You could forgive the Jag’s appalling reliability, and revel in the car’s awesome luxury. Leather seats rate highly on my list of luxury features you just can’t do without.
Premium sounds get the big tick on my list, as well. There’s nothing like cruising the motorway with crystal clear sounds. A good audio system is a must in my cars. And steering-wheel mounted audio controls are up there: though I can live without them, I’d prefer to have them.
You just gotta have air-con, too! Especially in Australia, where the heat of the summer sun can blister paint or fry an egg. Most flagship models for Mercedes Benz, Jaguar, BMW, HSV and Lexus have zoned climate control, where one occupant on one side of the back seat can have a different temperature and climate to the occupant sitting on the other side of the back seat. Not bad, eh? This is the sort of luxury item I like – though for some, what’s wrong with the manual wind-down windows?
Heated seats, televisions, seat massagers and GPS are gadgets that are starting to get over the top – don’t you reckon? These are the sort of ‘Bells and Whistles’ that only the snobs have, right? And what about parking sensors… this luxury feature just proves how badly you handle a vehicle in a shopping mall car park. I mean, surely, what sort of real man is going to brag about his parking sensors! Though I do have a weakness for heated seats…
One of the high-tech ‘way cool’ features that my dream car wouldn’t be without is the system that can change a flat tyre on the move. Forget the silly-sounding talking GPS unit or the automatic light- up sun visors for touching up lipgloss (do it at home, girls – much easier). Wouldn’t you rather be with a car that can change its own tyre, have the latest high-tech airbag for your knees and keep your morning coffee hot in the temperature-sensing driver’s cup holder?
The dreadful earthquake and tsunami in Japan will have an impact on practically every Western nation in some form or other.
We have been trying to find out how it will impact on the motor trade in Australia and frankly, it is very difficult to be definitive.
We do know that: –
- Some Japanese vehicle manufacturing plants, including Toyota, Mazda, Nissan and Subaru have ceased operation and will be gradually resuming production during April and May, but only on a limited basis.
- Whilst many Japanese branded cars are not actually manufactured in Japan, (for example, the only Honda that is fully manufactured in Japan is the Euro), Japan may well be the source of some crucial components.
- Similarly, even non-Japanese brands may well be dependant on Japan for components. Volkswagen, for example, source air-conditioning units from Japan.
This means that the shock that Japan experienced may well be felt much more widely than anticipated and some respected analysts predict that as much as 30% of the global automotive industry’s volume could be affected within six weeks.
We have surveyed most of the major manufacturers to get their take on how they may be affected. Understandably, may of them are reluctant to comment, and others are still uncertain and unclear.
Gone are the days when a car company would make the majority of its motor cars. Virtually all manufacturers source from all parts of the world. A typical car has approximately 5000 parts, and if just one part is sourced from Japan and can’t be sourced from elsewhere, then the whole plant could grind to a halt.
It does seem, though, that some notable brands have already suffered some supply problems – particularly with high tech diesel components, for example – but Japanese suppliers have been able to overcome the supply problems and we’ve just been told that diesel engine production is flowing again, much to the relief of manufacturers such as Peugeot, Land Rover and Citroen.
We have been assured by Hyundai and Kia that they have no supply problems and certainly many European brands remain unaffected too. However, Mazda, who have had to shut down all of their factories in Japan, are slowly resuming operations but have a very restricted power supply. This suggests that their highly popular 2 and 3 model small cars will be suffering severe supply problems in the coming months.
Toyota have been hit by supply shortages in its local operation, and have announced that it will halve its output from its car production line in Altona until supply lines improve. They will reassess the situation at the end of June.
Even if a manufacturer is largely unaffected with parts supply, it may be hit in other obscure ways; for example, some European and North American makers are experiencing shortages of certain colours of cars because some special pigments come from Japan and can’t be sourced from elsewhere.
So, what’s the message?
Simply, this is an enormous disaster that is impacting in many more ways than one could possibly anticipate. New car buyers need to be aware that their choices may be restricted. We will certainly be doing our best to keep abreast of developments, availability and pricing, but it is a time of turmoil where patience is paramount.
As a company, we have enormous sympathy for the plight of the millions of people who are suffering in Japan. Should you wish to assist by donating, we suggest you visit the Japan Tsunami Appeal website at www.wspa.org.au/Japan_appeal
or the Red Cross Appeal website at
A famous political saying of 50 years ago “You’ve never had it so good”* could well apply to today’s new car buyer.
We’ve been doing some homework on ‘value for money’ new cars comparing those manufactured today against those produced a generation ago.
We looked at two popular cars – the Holden Commodore and the Toyota Corolla.
Let’s look at the Corolla first.
In 1985, a Toyota Corolla CSX Hatchback 5-door with 5 speed manual transmission and a 1.6L engine cost a base price of $14,140, excluding delivery costs. Air-conditioning, power steering and front power windows were extra cost options which would have brought the price up to just under $17,000, excluding delivery costs.
Twenty-five years ago, the Holden Commodore was relatively new and was the most popular car of the year. A 1985 Commodore SL VK 3 speed automatic cost $14,815 at the dealership. Add to that the extra costs you had to pay for air-conditioning, 4 wheel disk brakes, power steering and power windows. This brought the price up to just over $18,200 before delivery and registration costs.
Now let’s adjust these 1985 prices, allowing for inflation and calculate them into today’s dollars. The consumer price index has nearly trebled – a factor of 2.615. So this means that in today’s dollars, the Commodore would have cost $47,632 and the then locally produced Corolla Hatchback translates into a staggering $44,324 at today’s prices.
Now let’s look at what hidden extras you get with the modern version that would have cost a motza in 1985 – assuming you could get them.
ANCAP Safety Ratings – the modern car has built-in crash protection; “crushability zones” and front and side airbags. They have anti-skid braking as standard – that hardly existed in 1985, and only on the most expensive cars like Mercedes, and traction control- which did not exist.
Whilst the enormous advances made with vehicle safety are probably the most important, let’s not forget reliability.
The JD Power company in the USA just released its’ latest annual reliability survey – see our report here. It shows a reliability factor of 151, which is the best that the survey has ever reported, and that’s an outstanding 140% improvement on reliability standards on those of 25 years ago.
But let’s put all of that aside and compare just the raw dealer floor prices.
We worked out that our venerable 1985 Toyota Corolla would cost $44,324 in today’s dollars. (Of course, if you add in all the safety features, you’d be looking at well over $50,000 but forget that for a moment.)
So, would you pay $44K for a new Corolla? Of course you wouldn’t – not when you can get a staggering 52% discount!! A new Corolla is just $21,000 – less than half the price of it’s 25 year old equivalent in today’s dollars..
That’s a great deal for a Corolla. Now how does the Holden Commodore fare?
We have an inflated 1985 cost of $47,632 and a brand new Commodore, equipped with airbags, anti-lock braking, traction control, CD player will set you back just $36,990, which is around 30% less than twenty-five years ago.
Just occasionally we have to remind ourselves that it is indeed true – “we have never had it so good!”
* British Prime Minister, Harold McMillan, 1957
JD Power is a highly respected market research company in the USA, and its annual new car reliability survey has garnered much attention over the last 40 years. They have just published their latest survey on new car reliability and customer satisfaction. The vehicle dependability survey took into account more than 43,000 original car owners of vehicles that were three years old and recorded any problems that arose in the past 12 months.
They use a factor of “number of problems per 100 cars”. This year’s results showed an average number of 151 problems per 100 cars which was the best figure ever recorded! There are some surprises on the list – we’ll just look at those cars that are available in Australia (the top car was, in fact, Ford’s US luxury brand, Lincoln).
The second most reliable brand, Lexus is no surprise as it has always performed well, earning just 109 points.
Perhaps more surprisingly (maybe that’s a little unfair as they have done particularly well in recent years) is Jaguar, with a performance figure of 112, well below the industry average.
Above average performers included (in order of reliability):
Mercedes Benz 128,
Honda 139 and
Of the brands that will not want this survey published, Mini heads the list with a figure of 221 – that’s more than double the problems experienced by the most reliable brand.
Mini are closely followed by:
Land Rover 212,
Mazda 181 and
Kia, Volvo, Subaru and Audi were pretty much line ball with the average.
Topping individual cars was the iconic 2008 Porsche 911 with a score of just 68.
Efforts have been made to get a similar survey conducted in Australia, but it has so far fallen on deaf ears.
If you fell for our April Fool’s post with the phoney press release about a Swedish company using urine as a biofuels, you can be forgiven for falling for it. The truth is actually not that far away.
There has been much (genuine!) excitement in the motoring world about biodiesel produced from algae, as this reduces dependency on limited supplies of fossil fuel and looks to a renewable resource. Some microorganisms produce oils within them that are suitable for use as a feedstock for producing biodiesel. These algae, which include the very common Chlorella, are able to use otherwise non-productive land and rather dubious water, which solves the biggest problem with other sources of biofuels: the crops grown for biofuels, such as corn or jatropha, often compete for good soil and water with food crops, which could cause problems for world food supplies. Algae, however, can be grown in open ponds, which can be built on otherwise useless land and can use wastewater or seawater.
And the wastewater in question can be sewage, which really does include human urine. Urine contains urea, which is commonly used as a fertiliser (for example, the old remedy for lemon trees that aren’t doing well is “a gentleman standing in front of it”), and the algae thrive on this, plus the other stuff in sewage. In New Zealand, one company has successfully harvested the algae from a town’s sewage ponds and refined it to produce biodiesel. The result is known as Green Crude™. This process has two major benefits: firstly, it provides a renewable source of biofuels; secondly, it speeds up the process of cleaning up wastewater, solving another problem.
Sweden, the home of our fictitious Løøflirpa (spell it backwards…), is a country that has a strong interest in biofuels – you only have to look at the biodiesel Volvo and Saab models to realise that. A very high proportion of their petrol stations provide biofuel or an ethanol blend, and they have Europe’s largest E85 alternative fuel fleet, thanks to some government incentives. Like our neighbours across the ditch, biofuels are being developed using sewage.
And what about here in Australia? We have our ethanol producers, mostly using by-products of Queensland’s sugar industry. Legislation has limited ethanol blends to E10 (10% ethanol to 90% unleaded petrol) but this is changing – and the Saab 9-3 Ecotec runs on it just fine. And yes, projects to grow and harvest biodiesel are underway – find out more about it here.
In case you missed it:
Poisson de Avril – French for April Fool (literally “April Fish”)
Tonto: Spanish for “stupid”
Necio: Spanish for fool
Majkat: Danish equivalent of April Fool (literally “May Cat”)
Dihydrous oxide: H2O